“whoever gets there first, wins” sounds fair to me too. In this case I believe the trees were there first so they should win, albeit I love solar too. But does cutting down trees help the environment?
Why can’t they just keep the trees “shaped” but not entirely chopped down – or bonsai them on a large scale somehow encouraging the branches to grow out instead of up
Might end up being really beautiful and unique!
I believe that is acceptable…. In the verdict there was some percentage shading that was acceptable.
i fully believe that couple B should have consult with couple A before doing something as stupid as planting a large tree indiscriminately i love trees and i love solar .. but c’mon.. isn’t there a way for them (both couples) able to work together? maybe making the solar “shelf” higher?
A few random thoughts:
- Bonzai-ing a redwood tree may not be very practical.
- “Getting there first” is one thing, but the problem with trees is that they get bigger. Whether a certain tree blocks your sun depends in part on what kind of tree it is, how well it grows in that location, and how willing your current and future neighbors are to trim it. There needs to be some kind of provision for future expectations as well.
- There’s a long-standing legal doctrine called “ancient lights”, holding, essentially, that if you have always had a certain view from your property, your neighbors can’t block it by building in front of it. That seems to be equivalent to “whoever gets there first”.
Please note, we will not approve your comment if it is spammy or you are blatantly trying to tout your own business. If you've got a reputable solar business and want to connect with us, please send us an email instead. We only connect our readers to trusted installers.