Comments on: Two SF-Gate Article Comments Reviewed

By: abdul

abdul — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:50:52 +0000

I agree with “John Stipes” .Thank you

By: www.quranreading.com

www.quranreading.com — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:51:54 +0000

Hi,
I know statistics are misleading.I think future of solar in San Francisco is bright.Now need of solar power is necessary for every country.

By: John Stipes

John Stipes — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:49:06 +0000

I agree that statistics may be misleading. The brief conversations that I have had with the efficiency experts at the power company have been rather frustrating despite a lot of interest and effort on my part to get solar installed. Of course, it’s still worth effort. My comment on the SF Gate articles is that it does not completely represent my point of view.

By: John Stipes

John Stipes — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 20:30:28 +0000

I agree, statistics can be misleading. However, the brief conversations that I’ve had with the efficiency experts at the power company about installing solar (on any house that I might purchase) have been discouraging, despite a lot of interest and effort on my part to try to clear the way for it to be installed.

By: Two SF-Gate Article Comments Reviewed | Solar Powered Cars . Net

Two SF-Gate Article Comments Reviewed | Solar Powered Cars . Net — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:43:14 +0000

[...] I’m going to respond to the comments citizens made, and also some of the misguided claims of the article themselves. From Article #1: “Among Bay Area counties, San Francisco ranks last in terms of solar energy installed per capita. … Read More [...]