“2008 report, “Freeing the Grid”.”
http://www.newenergychoices.org/uploads/FreeingTheGrid2008_report.pdf
[...] The SPR 2009 State by State Solar Report Card [...]
This is a very interesting survey, I write a green family blog here in Texas and was disappointed to see that big TX only scored an F, we have alot of work to do here and hopefully will move up the chart in 2010.
My family is hoping to install roof top solar next year and we’re trying to change make Texas greener one blog at a time! Thanks for the great info…
More in depth research is needed on this report card. Being from Iowa and recently having installed a PV system I can tell you the incentives in Iowa arn’t what you assume they are. For solar Iowa should rank well below MN and WI. As they say “read the fine print”
Hi Warren,
We’ve been looking back into some of the states and incentives. The most Wisconsin or Minnesota would move is 15 scaled points (even with excellent incentives, which they still don’t have comparably). This would equate to moving from an F to a D.
Regardless we’ll revisit the scores and update the card next year.
I love your chart! It makes those problem areas really stand out. I analyze paved parking statistics through GIS spatial analysis and use the data I create to promote solar parking lots – may I use your chart? Or use your color-scheme idea to create my own in Excel? Great work!
Not surprisingly, most of the states at the top of the list are “blue” states and the vast majority of states on the bottom of the list are “red” states. not sure why energy conservation became a political issue, but it clearly is…
Noting VT and NH ON GRID, REPORT CARD. WONDER IF ALL SKI RESORTS CAN CONVERT TO LOCAL, SOLAR GENERATION RATHER THAN NIBBLING, PR episodes of REC usage.
What about the simple factor of RATES?
From a quick look at your summary, it appears that little weight was given to the most pervasive determinant of all — ELECTRICITY RATES. My bet is that this factor alone could be used as an indicator of potential solar benefits.
The Colorado renewable energy standard is roughly the same as California (and arguably larger since it does not include hydro). We have rebates and the same federal tax credit, but we have one problem, CHEAP POWER which skews the numbers against solar.
This could explain the whole red state vs. blue state observation as well. “Red” states with their smaller population centers also would have cheaper power.
How ’bout giving us this relatively simple analysis for comparison?
Thanks the all your effort.
“Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated.” Confucius
Hi Cloud Ponderer,
I got the electricity rates covered in the 2010 report, stay tuned for the release next week!
- Dan
Please note, we will not approve your comment if it is spammy or you are blatantly trying to tout your own business. If you've got a reputable solar business and want to connect with us, please send us an email instead. We only connect our readers to trusted installers.