Alaska State Solar Power Rebates, Tax Credits, and Incentives

Alaska State Solar Picture

Solar Legislator Score:  Alaska State Solar Power Rebates, Tax Credits, and Incentives

STATE LEGISLATION

Alaska’s largest electric utility company, the Chugach Electric Association, recently installed and is operating a fuel cell system for the U.S. Postal Service. The one megawatt system is the largest commercial fuel cell installation in the nation, and marks the first time that such a system has been hooked up to an electric utility’s grid. Aside from that one event, Alaska has a very low profile in the promotion of alternative energy.

State legislators have no profile at all, particularly with regard to solar power. Alaska is the final frontier, and remote settlements mean many homes are built off-grid. Rising fuel costs are an added reason for the state to adopt aggressive measures to promote solar use by its residents. Having failed to provide such measures, Alaska’s Solar Legislator Score is “Pathetic”.

STATE INCENTIVE PROGRAMS, UTILITY REBATES, UTILITY LOANS, and UTILITY INCENTIVES

The Golden Valley Electric Association – Sustainable Natural Alternative Power (SNAP) Program serves about 90,000 residents in and around Fairbanks. Commercial, industrial, residential, nonprofit, schools, agricultural, and institutional GVEA customers are eligible for production incentives on solar thermal electric, photovoltaics, wind, and biomass installations. Systems up to 25kW in size qualify, but must be used exclusively for the generation of power sold to the utility; compensation is in the form of an annual payment. Program details: SNAP.
Loans to local government, municipal utility, and independent power producers are available through the only state solar incentive: the Power Project Loan Fund. Applicable to solar water heat, solar space heat, solar thermal electric, photovoltaics, wind, renewable transportation fuels, and municipal solid waste, the program is designed for the development or upgrade of small-scale power production facilities, conservation facilities, and bulk fuel storage facilities. Maximum loan amounts are determined by the amount of available funds in the program. Statutes and regulations are available here.

EXAMPLE RESIDENTIAL SOLAR INSTALLATION

If Alaska, our 49th state, were a sovereign nation, it would be the 19th largest in the world. There are a lot of wide open spaces to accommodate its sparse population of about 600,000 – an average of just slightly less than one square mile per inhabitant. Since Alaska is our northernmost state, it is also the coldest; nevertheless, the Alaskan skies provide plenty of sunshine for a solar energy system. Contrary to what some might assume, solar electric (photovoltaic) power is totally viable in Alaska (with the exception of a 3-month period in the dead of winter when efficiency is reduced by short daylight hours and a low angle of solar radiation).

We’ll look at a solar installation in Metro Anchorage, where about half the state’s population resides. Alaska’s high electrical rates but low usage produces an annual utility bill roughly equivalent to the national average; however, an array of solar collectors on a roof area of 450 square feet could produce enough supplemental power to cut that bill in half. A solar electric system would cost approximately $40,500 (midrange estimate for equipment and installation costs). Offsets include:

  • Federal tax credit: $2,000
  • Est. increase in Property Value: $8,700
  • Est. 25-year Utility Savings: $18,253
  • Est. greenhouse gas (CO2) saved over 25-year system life: 82.0 tons

CONSENSUS

It is quite apparent that the preceding numbers do not add up to a lot of encouragement for Alaskan homeowners to install solar energy, something which reflects on the lack of legislative priority. Not even Net Metering is available in the state. While there may be nearly a dozen other states that have similarly dropped the ball, Alaska’s leadership should look to the dozen or so more progressive states that have implemented many successful solar energy initiatives. In other words, Alaska, the performance bar is on the ground; pick it up and place it high.

Link to all posts related to Alaska

Click here to get hooked up with a local solar installer for your home or business

No comments yet, be the first!

Pingback on October 20th, 2007.

[...] Alaska [...]

Kevin Smith Identicon Icon Kevin Smith
Comment on August 21st, 2008.

My name is Kevin Smith and I have a interest in solar alternative energy’s jobs in the Alaska area. I have a lot of electrical/Mechanical experience. Do you have any recommendations?

Mike Identicon Icon Mike
Comment on February 17th, 2009.

Governor Palin’s crowing achievement is energy policy?

I guess the radiation up there is not great, and they get cheap oil, so it makes sense.

Miranda Identicon Icon Miranda
Comment on March 22nd, 2009.

My comment is really just a question…..
My question is if and when we do get an alternative resource lets say like solar energy where in Alaska can we use it?

Comment on January 20th, 2011.

Hello, My company manufactures wind turbines in Wasilla, Alaska. We build over 200 units a month and Alaska’s government has made it so tough letting utility companies require unreasonable minimum requirements, unreasonable compensation for energy sold. We believe here that a kwh is a kwh reguardless if it’s from oil or gas. However shouldn’t the kwh if available be used from a wind turbine or solar panel before it’s used from oil and gas or atleast an equivalent cost if sold back? We can’t even get the same for a kwh sold from a wind turbine to be equal to a purchased kwh from gas not that the wind turbines dont produce it cheap enough as ours do it at 3cents a kwh but the electrical companies do not recognize it as a full kwh credit only partial. Example we pay 13cents a kwh currently and if we sell a kwh back from our wind generator they only have to pay us 4 cents a kwh. Shouldn’t we atleast get wholesale rate of 6 cents a kwh? I say coop’s should be forced to buy power from there own customers as a community power company. Before they choose outside companies instead. As long as the power is the same price or less.
Perhaps then we would sell more than 2 wind turbines a month to Alaskan’s and over 198 turbines to other states.

Brent Olsen Identicon Icon Brent Olsen
Comment on August 16th, 2011.

Solar power is certainly the route to independence from foreign oil and utility companies. The wind turbines produced by Scott Steven’s company (see prior post)are completely inadequate and unreliable to provide the kind of sustainable power needed. Perhaps that is why Alaska requires a minimum output from alternative energy sources. Hence the reason Alaskans buy solar panels, rather than poorly designed wind turbines. Solar panels provide a far greater return on investment than the wind turbines sold in Wasilla.

Comment on January 15th, 2012.

Alaskans pay more than the average per gallon of gas than any other state. Who gets all that oil money?

What do you think? Please leave a comment:

Names and email addresses are required (email addresses are not displayed) URLs are optional. If you want your email address to appear, please leave it in the body of your comment.


Please note, we will not approve your comment if it is spammy or you are blatantly trying to tout your own business. If you've got a reputable solar business and want to connect with us, please send us an email instead. We only connect our readers to trusted installers.